Denote the numbers as `a_1 lt= a_2 lt= a_3 lt= a_4 lt= a_5 lt= a_6 lt= a_7.` It is given that:
`(a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4 + a_5 + a_6 + a_7)/7 = 12,`
`(a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4)/4 = 8,`
`(a_4 + a_5 + a_6 + a_7)/4 = 20.`
From these equation we can find the sum of the `3` greatest numbers and the sum of the `3` smallest numbers:
`a_1 + a_2 + a_3 =(a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4 + a_5 + a_6 + a_7)`
`-(a_4 + a_5 + a_6 + a_7) = 12*7 - 20*4 = 4,`
`a_5 + a_6 + a_7 =(a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4 + a_5 + a_6 + a_7)`
`-(a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + a_4) = 12*7 - 8*4 = 52.`
The difference in question is 52 - 4 = 48.
But actually these conditions are contradictory. It is simple to find `a_4,` it is
`(a_4 + a_5 + a_6 + a_7) - (a_5+a_6+a_7) = 80 - 52 = 28.`
But all next numbers, `a_5,` `a_6` and `a_7,` must be at least `28,` therefore its sum is at least `84,` not `52.` So the correct answer is "this is impossible".
No comments:
Post a Comment